By searching the key word “Chinese etymology”, Richard Sears’ website always ranks number 1. Recently, many newspapers in China reported his work.
What is the difference between his work and Gong’s system?
Calista wrote:By searching the key word “Chinese etymology”, Richard Sears’ website always ranks number 1. Recently, many newspapers in China reported his work.
What is the difference between his work and Gong’s system?
r.green wrote:
Richard Sears’ work is not etymology. Please read Dr. Victor Mair’s article at http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2910
Calista wrote:r.green wrote:
Richard Sears’ work is not etymology. Please read Dr. Victor Mair’s article at http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2910
The mission of Google is to provide the best site which matches the given key word. If Richard Sears' site is not about Chinese etymology, it should not rank number 1. Should we info this to Google?
Calista wrote:The mission of Google is to provide the best site which matches the given key word. If Richard Sears' site is not about Chinese etymology, it should not rank number 1. Should we info this to Google?
Calista wrote:By searching the key word “Chinese etymology”, Richard Sears’ website always ranks number 1. Recently, many newspapers in China reported his work.
What is the difference between his work and Gong’s system?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest